Hey Jeremy,
I could imagine the node version (requiring "extra" steps anyway)
supporting auto-updating of plugins/core, while the single-file version is
more like a "frozen" wiki you have to manually upgrade.
On Sunday, December 16, 2018 at 1:22:12 PM UTC-6, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> Hi Diego
>
> Is this not a good way to keep plugins and even the core auto-updated?
>
>
> The fetch command only works under Node.js and not within the browser.
>
> As noted above, we can make HTTP requests in the browser but we're
> restricted to endpoints that are CORS enabled, which GitHub Pages is not.
> That's why the plugin library is based on loading the library in an iframe
> and communicating with it via window.postMessage.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> On Sunday, December 16, 2018 at 12:09:06 PM UTC-6, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>
>> Hi Joe
>>
>> A couple of comments
>>
>> 1) I like the idea of collaborating at the level of "single tiddlers"
>> All I have to do is put a single tiddler on github and publish the
>> address and off we go.
>>
>> 2) Bundles of related tiddlers could be published with names like
>> Tiddler.tid.zip (or something)
>>
>>
>> You can use a JSON file as a container for multiple tiddlers. The format
>> is:
>>
>> [
>> {
>> "title": "HelloThere",
>> "text": "Foo",
>> "type": "text/vnd.tiddlywiki",
>> "tags": "TableOfContents",
>> "modified": "20181206090053690",
>> "created": "20130822170200000"
>> },
>> {
>> "title": "GettingStarted",
>> "text": "Bar",
>> "type": "text/vnd.tiddlywiki",
>> "tags": "TableOfContents",
>> "modified": "20181206090053690",
>> "created": "20130822170200000"
>> }
>> ]
>>
>> 3) I suspect github or Google pages or (whatever) will muck with the
>> content-types and so on
>> but it would be easy to just define "tiddlers over HTTP" - just send them
>> as regular HTTP pages
>> where the Body is tiddler (headers and all) - ie the .tid file verbatim.
>>
>>
>> I’d like to be able to support the current range of tiddler file types,
>> either by specifying an override content type, or perhaps by sniffing the
>> file extension.
>>
>> 4) It seems to me the creating an entire TW (as a single all-in-one file)
>> is a job of collating and selecting
>> which tiddlers you want to appear in the final TW.
>>
>> Of course, many users will not want this fine level of granularity - but
>> I rather like the idea of 'remoting'
>> individual tiddlers.
>>
>> Really this is a discussion about what I might call "the granularity of
>> collaboration" - which I think is an individual tiddler.
>>
>> When I've written books most of the discussion with my editor has been
>> over individual paragraphs and not the
>> whole - put the parts together into the whole is a different exercise.
>>
>> It could be quite fun. See my
>>
>> - https://joearms.github.io/tiddlers/A programmers introduction to
>> the TiddlyWiki.tid
>>
>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fjoearms.github.io%2Ftiddlers%2FA%2520programmers%2520introduction%2520to%2520the%2520TiddlyWiki.tid&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNELHRa4E0GprfLXl5j9yrltBWdlkw>
>>
>> Excellent stuff, that’s a good perspective to write from.
>>
>> I can image people pushing minor changes to this, or proposing
>> alternatives - getting the individual tiddlers right
>> seems a nice step *before* assembling the parts into the whole. Of
>> course, this is an approximation and the two phases
>> writing tiddlers and assembling them into larger parts cannot be
>> separated - but the TW allow seamless flipping between these two modes.
>>
>>
>> Indeed, the “twederation” dream is to be able to do all of this without
>> GitHub, too.
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>> Fun stuff
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> /Joe
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, 16 December 2018 18:18:50 UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Joe
>>>
>>> I'd like some feedback on some tiddlers I've been writing.
>>>
>>> If I publish the tidders on github (ie the individual tiddlers and NOT
>>> an entire TW)
>>> is there a syntax that can be used that can yank in and view the tiddler
>>> from any other
>>> TW?)
>>>
>>> I realise this breaks security - but would be very convenient - can the
>>> remote tiddler be run in a
>>> iframe? or some other trusted mode?
>>>
>>>
>>> We can do that from Node.js (running in the browser we can only retrieve
>>> from HTTP endpoints that are CORS enabled).
>>>
>>> There’s a “fetch” command that retrieves tiddlers over HTTP that ought
>>> to be able to do the job:
>>>
>>> tiddlywiki editions/empty/ --verbose --fetch file
>>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/master/editions/dev/tiddlers/HelloThere.tid
>>> '[!is[system]]' '' --build index
>>>
>>> It’s intended for exactly this kind of use case.
>>>
>>> https://tiddlywiki.com/#FetchCommand
>>>
>>> In particular, a useful arrangement is to save the URLs of the files
>>> you’re importing in the URL field of tiddlers tagged, say, “remote-server”,
>>> and then you can use a filter to specify a bunch of URLs to read:
>>>
>>> tiddlywiki editions/empty/ --verbose --fetch files
>>> '[tag[remote_server]get[url]]' '[!is[system]]' '' --build index
>>>
>>> However, it doesn’t work with GitHub at the moment because it returns
>>> all files with the content type “text/plain” which confuses the import
>>> mechanism. We could fix this easily enough by allowing an override content
>>> type to be specified as an additional command parameter.
>>>
>>> Best wishes
>>>
>>> Jeremy.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> /Joe
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/13edcef6-3cff-495b-a18f-4858855821ab%40googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/13edcef6-3cff-495b-a18f-4858855821ab%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "TiddlyWikiDev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/0c3515a1-b957-4c66-b470-e9fd8c3ce85c%40googlegroups.com
>>
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/0c3515a1-b957-4c66-b470-e9fd8c3ce85c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWikiDev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/2a5a20bf-37e2-46c9-9285-ee343336409b%40googlegroups.com
>
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/2a5a20bf-37e2-46c9-9285-ee343336409b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/1198347d-1491-41c9-a4e4-eb6127f23c12%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.