>> Is there any reason why savers are not chained ?
> 
> hmm, ... Nobody did create a backwards compatible PR ... yet ;)

What does "chained" mean in this context? The savers are already stored in a 
priority ordered list.

Best wishes

Jeremy


>  
>> 2 - I started to work on a saver.
>> I'll see the syncadaptor afteward.
>> Step by step :-)
> 
> I think, that's the right way to go. savers are much simpler at the 
> beginning. 
> 
> -m 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TiddlyWikiDev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/4e18f2b7-8867-496f-8104-112d60ab208d%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/3E62B61D-C186-4877-A38F-96FB3F9797CE%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to