@Saq
The itemfilter stuff works. There is a noticeable delay which I estimate to
be proportional to the number of items i.e the list of items is much longer
for [[ than for << or <$ ... or perhaps more correctly expressed, it's
probably proportional to the complexity of the itemfilter.
---
An observation (or is it faulty reasoning?): the itemfilter is only
relevant if the popup tool also has a fragment ("??tr" does not use a
fragment, to name one example). And, it is only if it has a fragment that
it needs a triggerend. ...but if it has a fragment that *must *match some
condition (e.g match a predefined string), then the triggerend becomes
superfluous.
Might this mean we could skip the use of triggerends all together? The
general question is: Will the user want to construct a popup tool that
produces a picklist where the item names are allowed to contain the very
closing string for what triggers the tool? I think it might be fair to
simply not allow this, or can you think of some case? ...Or is the premise
of my reasoning flawed?
---
Amusing observation, if one is easily amused: If you type e.g [[Ed and move
the caret with the arrow keys and then pick a title, the insert will be at
the new place. Yes, that is "the point" but I hadn't considered this case
:-)
---
Check out the new transclusion tool! It is super fun!!! Even for those who
are not easily amused! Styling is totally messed up, but never mind.
<:-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/6a4852ca-7452-4c76-a50f-02e841a8d382o%40googlegroups.com.
