On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 10:35:16 AM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Mat wrote: >> >> Interesting developments. >> >> \customize is the perfect name for this pragma! >> >> A critical question (which kind of brings back things I stated in the >> very beginning of this thread/discussion): Who should use this? >> As noted, there's a distinction between tiddlyfiddling/coding vs. >> notetakeing/authoring. >> > > Mat & PMario > > Mat, I think you right to mark that point again. > > But I believe that PMario intends that there is a DEFAULT where markup > symbols are used for clearly defined action. >
That's right. > The more complex "custom pragmas" enable a lot more. But I think he > intends the latter are built on top of the former? > Yes. At the moment it's still "beta", and it probably will be published as beta-with docs :) While testing the possibilities I found out, that it should be possible to create something like the new DETAILS hmtl tag, with wikitext markup. I think that \importcustom [[Details]] ´details ´summary Details - Summay text ------ line 1 line 2 adsf --- Is a self describing text and once rendered it does what it says. After finding out, that DETAILS worked I wanted to be able to find a different way for TW TABLEs. The existing markup is OK for simple tables, but it gets super complex, if you need advanced tables. It breaks, if you need multiline text in a table. I wanted to fix that. .. With the existing experiments, it seems to be possible for users to dynamically create tables, with existing core widgets. The naming needs to be improved, but once that's done I think the power is endless. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/231914c5-8736-4e66-b81d-326b63f2141eo%40googlegroups.com.
