Pierre Ossman wrote: > Is there any point to keeping the deferred update system? In the long term, I would say no, if we can figure out how to get the same performance without it. For the moment, however, setting it to 0 will have a negative performance impact. For now, I would say keep it and set it to 1 ms.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
