On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:08:30PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:03:31 +0200 > Adam Tkac <at...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:43:19PM +0200, Peter Åstrand wrote: > > > > > > What about WinVNC, has anyone actually built it recently? I guess we need > > > to decide on build requirements for it. The only realistic option at this > > > point is some version of MSVC, but which one? Earlier, we have been > > > building with MSVC .NET 2003 aka VC7.1. Is this OK with anyone? Who wants > > > to produce the actual binary? > > > > If we are using GNU build chain for Win viewer then we should use it > > for winvnc as well, I think. Unified build environment is always good > > idea. > > Agreed, but I don't think it's possible right now. It's on my todo list > for post-1.0.0.
I have similar plans, it is crucial part of full IPv6 support. For now I opened feature request (#2743980, Unified build environment) and we will discuss proper solution during 1.1.0 development phase. Adam -- Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
