Den 2009-04-22 16:34 skrev Pierre Ossman: > In case someone has already started looking at implementing this, > here's another update. > > Changed: > > - Require that the ExtendedDesktopSize is sent without any data > updates.
I think it would be useful to explicitely state somewhere that a client receiving an ExtendedDesktopSize rectangle with the size of the framebuffer that it already knows about must not issue a FramebufferUpdateRequest with incremental set to zero (unless it has some other reason to do so). I'm sure you have implemented your client to not issue needless non-incremental update requests in this case, but it is the simple thing to do. Since it leads to disaster to do the simple thing it should be noted explicitely that you must not do so, methinks. Nitpick: in several places you have written "a ExtendedDesktopSize", it should be "an ExtendedDesktopSize". Cheers, Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
