On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:47:43 +0200 Peter Rosin <p...@lysator.liu.se> wrote:
> Den 2009-04-24 11:00 skrev Pierre Ossman: > > I feel a bit like every option results in ugly complexity somewhere. :/ > > > > The best option would be if we could extend the init sequence, but I'm > > not sure that's feasible. > > If you can live with a dependency on the tight security type, you're all > set. > The tight mechanism is fairly sensible. The problem is that it is underdocumented and not widely implemented. As such, I see it as a hindrance towards having other VNC implementations use this extension. > > I sometimes regret that I didn't do it this way for the gii > extension [1]. I didn't know how the tight security type worked > when I did that (at least that's how I defend myself these days, > can't say that I remember when I knew what with 100% certainity). > With some proper documentation we might be able to make that extension mechanism more popular. *wink* Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
