OK, I guess the question I'm asking is -- is it worth it to try to bring the assembly files into the dsw/dsp projects, create custom build rules for NASM, etc., or would it be better to just hold off until we port to MinGW? My inclination is the latter, because I just realized I don't actually have a version of Visual C++ that can directly use the dsw/dsp projects. I am using VC Express 2008, which has to convert the project files into its own format before I can modify them.
Peter Åstrand wrote: >> Just for my own clarity, though, aren't we moving away from VC at some >> point? I'm happy to fix this and make it work for the moment, if we >> think we want to be able to use libjpeg/SIMD in VC as an interim >> solution. > > Yes, we are moving away from VC, as soon as possible. We just need to > make WinVNC etc build with MinGW. As I understand it, "everybody" has > this on their TODO list :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel