On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:35:08 +0200 Adam Tkac <at...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > string handling is very different if you look in various parts of > code. It would be nice to start to standardize it and use unified > mechanism. I see three possible ways: > > 1. Use the C++ String class > 2. Use the rfb/util.h:CharArray class > 3. Use standard C strings with *printf() and str*() functions > > >From my point of view the best solution will be to use variant 3. > (C-like handling) because you don't have to deal with objects and > affraid of additional overhead. But the 1. variant is probably > also a good idea. > > The 2. variant should not be choosen because I don't see any advantage > from CharArray class. > > What is your opinion? Do you vote for C or C++? ;) > I'm no fan of C++, so I vote C. -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
