1. Use the C++ String class 2. Use the rfb/util.h:CharArray class 3. Use standard C strings with *printf() and str*() functionsFrom my point of view the best solution will be to use variant 3.(C-like handling) because you don't have to deal with objects and affraid of additional overhead. But the 1. variant is probably also a good idea. The 2. variant should not be choosen because I don't see any advantage from CharArray class. What is your opinion? Do you vote for C or C++? ;)
I'm no fan of C++ either, but the string features is actually one of those things that I like.
Aren't the three different variants above somewhat apples and oranges? If I remember correctly, both 1 and 2 can handle embedded null characters, while 3 cannot. At least not without passing along an extra variable that indicates the length. OTOH, perhaps strings with embedded nulls are uncommon.
Regards, ---
Peter Åstrand ThinLinc Chief Developer Cendio AB http://www.cendio.com Wallenbergs gata 4 583 30 Linköping Phone: +46-13-21 46 00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
