Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> Hi, the attached two patches (against tigervnc 1.0.0) are my first
> working version of this.
> 
> I'm building against 1.7.3.901 under gentoo. So far I've only had the
> time to test Xvnc itself, but it seems to be ok so far...

I found my port to 1.7 was simplified by first taking the patch from
the upstream svn to replace the XORG_16 style defines with the XORG
define so that the existing checks became "#if XORG >= 16"

http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/x-cons/XW_NV_tw-clone/open-src/xserver/xvnc/upstream-xorg-version.patch
is the copy I use in my builds.

-- 
        -Alan Coopersmith-           alan.coopersm...@sun.com
         Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-devel mailing list
Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel

Reply via email to