Quoting Adam Tkac <at...@redhat.com>: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 07:52:04AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: >> Andrew de Quincey wrote: >> > Hi, the attached two patches (against tigervnc 1.0.0) are my first >> > working version of this. >> > >> > I'm building against 1.7.3.901 under gentoo. So far I've only had the >> > time to test Xvnc itself, but it seems to be ok so far... >> >> I found my port to 1.7 was simplified by first taking the patch from >> the upstream svn to replace the XORG_16 style defines with the XORG >> define so that the existing checks became "#if XORG >= 16" >> >> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/x-cons/XW_NV_tw-clone/open-src/xserver/xvnc/upstream-xorg-version.patch >> is the copy I use in my builds. > > Yes, this is the main reason why we started to use XORG <number> > instead of XORG_<number>. > > The "X.Org 1.7" patch is really welcomed. I will look on it and merge > it to the main repo.
Ah that is much nicer yes; I'll resubmit a patch against SVN with this change in an hour or so. (My first priority was to get my headless server's VNC working again so I worked against the 1.0.0 release initially :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
