On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:28:45 +0200 Adam Tkac <at...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello all, > > I did a little storm in current trunk and now we have VeNCrypt security > type implemented. > > Original VeNCrypt supports six subtypes but I implemented only two of > them, called TLSNone and TLSVnc. TLSNone only estabilishes TLS > connection and no additional authentication is performed. TLSVnc > estabilishes TLS as well but it additionaly performs standard VncAuth > authentication. > > As a side effect of VeNCrypt support I cleaned security related code > (I hope it is cleanup, not a pollution :) ). This cleanup will > continue and in the end we will have more centralised authentication > code for both server and viewer. Currently we have a lot of > duplicated code in both server and client which is obviously bad. > > VeNCrypt support has been tested against original VeNCrypt > implementation and vinagre viewer and everything works fine on my > machine. More testers are welcomed! :) > Patches to rfbproto.rst? :) -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
