On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:54:20PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:28:45 +0200 > Adam Tkac <at...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I did a little storm in current trunk and now we have VeNCrypt security > > type implemented. > > > > Original VeNCrypt supports six subtypes but I implemented only two of > > them, called TLSNone and TLSVnc. TLSNone only estabilishes TLS > > connection and no additional authentication is performed. TLSVnc > > estabilishes TLS as well but it additionaly performs standard VncAuth > > authentication. > > > > As a side effect of VeNCrypt support I cleaned security related code > > (I hope it is cleanup, not a pollution :) ). This cleanup will > > continue and in the end we will have more centralised authentication > > code for both server and viewer. Currently we have a lot of > > duplicated code in both server and client which is obviously bad. > > > > VeNCrypt support has been tested against original VeNCrypt > > implementation and vinagre viewer and everything works fine on my > > machine. More testers are welcomed! :) > > > > Patches to rfbproto.rst? :)
Yes, they will follow soon. I hope I will be able to send them till Monday. -- Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
