On 11/09/10 14:57, Adam Tkac wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:37:34AM +0100, ti...@piments.com wrote:
>> On 11/03/10 21:25, Antoine Martin wrote:
>>> On 11/04/2010 03:20 AM, ti...@piments.com wrote:
>>>> On 11/03/10 19:17, ti...@piments.com wrote:
>>>>>     (I did a clean
>>>>> pull a couple of days back but this issue seems to  be happening the
>>>>> same on 1.0.1 1.0.92 built from Antoine's tarball and two day old svn.
>>>>> which identifies itself as 1.0.90)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> oops, small error there. I don't know where I saw 1.0.92. It was not
>>>> from Antoine because when I went to check what I posted I see he does
>>>> not seem to provide source (which he probably should  ;) ).
>>> You didn't look hard enough ;)
>>> http://shifter.devloop.org.uk/trac/browser/contrib-src/tigervnc-1.0.90-r4086.tar.gz
>>> Which is a straight checkout of svn revision 4086.
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>>>
>>
>> My apologies. It was the trac interface that mislead me.
>> I was looking at where I got the binary:
>> http://shifter.devloop.org.uk/trac/browser/web/beta/jaunty/main/binary-amd64?rev=3056
>>
>> Here I worked my way up and down the big red clickable path at the top
>> looking for src. It appears that "web" is the root level.  Now you give
>> me the URL I realise that I need to ignore the big red letters and click
>> on ../  and I find another level including contrib-src , oh well, now I
>> know. thanks.
>>
>> Progress:
>> I have been able to reproduce your binary from that snapshot and not
>> surprisingly it works.
>>
>> Then I tried :0 and realised I forgot to configure it to build the
>> module. (This also matches your build since you don't provide the module.)
>>
>> Having applied xserver16.patch and done autoreconf etc I now find that
>> the server crashes as before.
>>
>> I am now convinced that the precise version of tigervnc is not a factor
>> here.
>
> Ok, I tried to reproduce this issue on Ubuntu 9.04 and you are
> right that libvnc.so module crashes the X server. However I tried to
> update to the Ubuntu 9.10 and everything works fine there. I remember
> there was some bug in the Xorg which prevented to use gimp/inscape
> together with libvnc.so but I can't find it now.
>
> Since Canonical no longer supports Ubuntu 9.04 I would like to
> recommend to update to Ubuntu 9.10 and this issue gets fixed.
>
> Regards, Adam
>

LOL, I posted just that info earlier this morning, but looking at my 
sent mail I realise I replied to DRG only, not to the list.

For the benefit of the list here it is:

Hi,

I updated kubuntu to 9.10 and the same builds worked correctly  for both 
DISPLAY:0 and DISPLAY:1

9.04 is now out of support from ubuntu so I guess the problem has died 
of old age.

thx.



I specifically asked if you knew of any such issues on the RH bug you'd 
already replied to , you did not come back on it.

Nice to see you managed to find the time to "reproduce" it after I 
posted the same information . If you had been able to supply that info a 
week ago it may have saved me several days pissing into the wind.

regards, Peter.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper
David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a 
Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your 
business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-devel mailing list
Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel

Reply via email to