On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:03:39 -0600 DRC <dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > It would really be nice to quantify it somehow, because it doesn't seem > to be any better in terms of responsiveness, either. I'm testing up in > the range of 100-200 ms ping time, or rather, 50-100 ms added on both ends. That's odd. Maybe it's not being properly enabled. Are you getting "enabling continuous updates" in the output from the client? The only numbers you can easily get is to turn on the debugging info for the congestion control. There's a define at the top of VNCSConnection.cxx. It will also provide the kernel's view of things for reference (only relevant if you're not using any proxying). Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
