On 12/22/11 3:50 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote: > Testing and preparing for release here has meant that I haven't had > time to look at this properly yet. My current attitude towards it right > now though is that, yes, a regression of the magnitude you're seeing is > not desired and should be fixed. I would like to explore the whole > issue of the deferred updates further though. But there is probably not > time for that right now. So we can change it to 1 ms and get a release > out, and then revisit the issue after the release.
OK, that's fine by me. I'm not interested in officially going into beta before January 1, because most people are probably out of the office this week and next, but we can consider r4825 to be a "soft beta" within the project. I want to make sure Brian is OK with putting the Java stuff in beta as well before we go forward with it and branch the code. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Write once. Port to many. Get the SDK and tools to simplify cross-platform app development. Create new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
