On Wed, 28 Dec 2011, DRC wrote:
If we start getting into such esoteric stuff as having separate launcher
scripts, then why wouldn't I just create a completely different build
procedure that gives me all the defaults I want?
I don't understand why you think a two-line script is esoteric. The
advantage of having two launch scripts instead of a customized build
procedure is that only one type of binares are necessary. This also means
that you can run multiple Xvnc instances with settings optimal for 2D and
3D at the same time, on the same server. Different users might use
different applications or might be on different networks with different
performance.
Or better yet, why wouldn't I just fork the project so I wouldn't have
to deal with your grief anymore?
You must answer that question yourself.
Rgds,
---
Peter Åstrand ThinLinc Chief Developer
Cendio AB http://www.cendio.com
Wallenbergs gata 4
583 30 Linköping Phone: +46-13-21 46 00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-devel mailing list
Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
