On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:28:40 -0600 DRC <dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> I disagree with this patch. As we discussed and agreed to in the bug > report, we cannot support arbitrary configurations in which a user tries > to set up their own version of FLTK with limited functionality. Either > it has the necessary functionality for TigerVNC or it doesn't. > > If this patch is truly necessary for some esoteric reason, then this > should have been first discussed and captured in the relevant bug report. > It should be possible to build things with a vanilla FLTK, albeit with reduced functionality. I figured that was apparent given that we checked for the extra features and have conditional code based on those detections. Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
