On 1/23/12 3:16 PM, Pierre Ossman wrote: >> I disagree with this patch. As we discussed and agreed to in the bug >> report, we cannot support arbitrary configurations in which a user tries >> to set up their own version of FLTK with limited functionality. Either >> it has the necessary functionality for TigerVNC or it doesn't. >> >> If this patch is truly necessary for some esoteric reason, then this >> should have been first discussed and captured in the relevant bug report. >> > > It should be possible to build things with a vanilla FLTK, albeit with > reduced functionality. I figured that was apparent given that we > checked for the extra features and have conditional code based on those > detections.
OK, but if that is the case, then it should still be a fatal error if a particular FLTK feature is enabled and the X libraries needed to support that feature are not present. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
