Sorry, my bad, I thought you had actually branched 1.2 already. I don't
think this is release ready code, would it make more sense to branch at
4840 or 4841, or for me to back out 4842 temporarily and re-apply after you
branch?
Thanks,
-brian
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:51 AM, DRC <dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net>wrote:
> I hadn't actually branched 1.2 yet, so trunk is still supposed to be
> stable. I was waiting for a more reasonable explanation of 4841 from
> Pierre before branching, as that patch appears destabilizing as well.
>
>
> On 2/2/12 11:38 PM, bph...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > Revision: 4842
> >
> http://tigervnc.svn.sourceforge.net/tigervnc/?rev=4842&view=rev
> > Author: bphinz
> > Date: 2012-02-03 05:38:23 +0000 (Fri, 03 Feb 2012)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
> _______________________________________________
> Tigervnc-devel mailing list
> Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-devel mailing list
Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
