Perhaps I'm still missing something, because after examining the patch again, I don't see where the original buffer corruption was occurring or how your patch fixes it. Part of the difficulty in analyzing this patch is that you seem to have taken the opportunity to move a lot of things around to conform to your own personal preferences. I would ask you to please reformulate the patch with as few changes as possible and to clarify where the buffer corruption was occurring.
On 2/3/12 9:00 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:03:06 -0600 > DRC <dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > >> >> I have not seen this, either in high-level or low-level tests. Please >> explain how to reproduce it. > > The easiest way to provoke it is with a composited desktop and a solid > blue background. I've been using the Gnome 3 fallback on Fedora 16. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
