On 6/5/12 1:51 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote: > vncviewer already has many command line parameters. We shouldn't add > another one unless it's absolutely necessary. It's better if things like > these can be handled automatically.
What you decide to do about it (if anything) is up to you. I'm just expressing that the 3D community definitely wants true double buffering, and such is not present in the current release of TigerVNC. The easiest way to fix it, even if it's just a short-term fix, is to add a new configuration parameter. Personally, I don't buy the argument that it's necessary to put a timeout on FBU's, and I'm not sure how you would go about automating such a thing. I certainly don't buy the argument that adding a new configuration parameter is such a big deal if it gives users an option for true double buffering. You're more or less trying to automate it already, and it isn't working, hence the bug report. However, none of that is my problem. I just filed the bug report as a courtesy. Talk amongst yourselves. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
