On 10/2/12 5:24 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote: > It would seem so, yes. x0vncserver is mostly a proof-of-concept than a > production ready implementation. Nobody's really working on it. > > As an alternative, TigerVNC has a Xorg VNC module that you can load > into your normal X server. This will give you similar functionality to > Xvnc. It is more difficult to build though as you must build it exactly > the same way as your local X server.
I should also point out that x11vnc in libvncserver 0.9.9 now uses the TurboVNC encoder, so it should encode with approximately the same performance as TigerVNC. It's not going to be as good as using an Xorg module built against the system's X server source, but x11vnc is about 100 times easier to build, and it will probably be somewhat faster than x0vncserver, since x11vnc has some fairly sophisticated ways of monitoring the X server for changed areas. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
