On Thu, 28 May 2009 17:00:56 +0100 "Daniel P. Berrange" <d...@berrange.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:59:51PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > This thread seems to have died off. > > > > Daniel, do you feel that your concerns have been addressed, or do we > > need more discussion? > > I'm fine with the principle that key repeat should be generated client > side, but I'm not convinced that clients should send a series of > down-down-down events without agreeing this behaviour with the server. > Servers have to deal with this anyway given that the Windows vncviewer in both version 3 and 4 of RealVNC uses this behaviour, and almost every VNC implementation derives from these. Also, given the dominance of the Windows platform, I'd say the absolute majority of all VNC sessions will already be using this method. So us stating that it is the preferred mode is only documenting reality as it already is. What server was it that mishandled this sequence? Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com
_______________________________________________ tigervnc-rfbproto mailing list tigervnc-rfbproto@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-rfbproto
