On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:36:13 -0400 Brian Hinz <bph...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> FYI. I wasn't aware that the RFB protocol had been RFC'd. > A bit unfortunate, but not unexpected. We noticed the RFC work back before it was finalised and tried to get involved (as the work was based on the original RealVNC specification which we know has issues). Unfortunately we didn't get any attention, and it now seems we have an RFC which lacks a lot of important clarifications. :/ Anyone up for starting a new RFC with our improvements? :) Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ tigervnc-rfbproto mailing list tigervnc-rfbproto@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-rfbproto
