On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:02:34 -0400 Brian Hinz <bph...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Has anyone dealt with IANA yet? Are they not responsive? I would have > thought that having the specification controlled by someone that doesn't > necessarily have a vested interest in the protocol would be a good thing. It most certainly is. I was thinking about clarifications in the core protocol specification (e.g. the dangers of switching pixel format) though, not extensions. Those are in most cases probably better described in separate RFC:s. Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ tigervnc-rfbproto mailing list tigervnc-rfbproto@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-rfbproto
