Hi Guys,
On 12/2/08 1:41 PM, "Jukka Zitting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Dave Meikle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think we should probably release the current trunk given the improvement >> to provide Java 1.4 support. I would be inclined to release this as 0.2 >> given we haven't released anything so far. > > OK, that's fine by me. +1. > >> One thing about the naming of the release artefacts - whilst we can simply >> use the apache-tika name for the source JAR or tarball, given that the >> binary file is the result of a maven build the name will be tika-0.2.jar. > > I think that's fine. Having "apache" in the package name is nice but > not really necessary. I'd just leave the binary file names as is. > +1. I think that it's important to stay consistent with the naming, and since we released the original incubating src as " apache-tika-0.1-incubating-src.tar.gz", I think we should do something similar e.g., apache-tika-0.2-src.tar.gz. However, the jar file for 0.1-incubating was named tika-0.1-incubating.jar, so let's stay the same with 0.2, e.g., tika-0.2.jar. So, long story short, +1 from me too. Cheers, Chris > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Disclaimer: The opinions presented within are my own and do not reflect those of either NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology.
