Hi, On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Michael Wechner <michael.wech...@wyona.com> wrote: > +1, whereas what does it mean exactly re backwards compatibility or rather > current projects using for example 0.1-incubating?
We should be able to do the split simply by packaging the existing classes differently, i.e. no changes would be needed in downstream code. Simply reconfiguring your dependencies should be enough. On the other hand we may want to think about making the Java package naming better match the component boundaries. Perhaps we should keep the current package names for the 0.x releases, and reconsider the structure before doing 1.0 when we have more experience on how the Tika codebase should best be split to components. BR, Jukka Zitting
