Jukka Zitting schrieb:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Michael Wechner
<michael.wech...@wyona.com> wrote:
+1, whereas what does it mean exactly re backwards compatibility or rather
current projects using for example 0.1-incubating?
We should be able to do the split simply by packaging the existing
classes differently, i.e. no changes would be needed in downstream
code. Simply reconfiguring your dependencies should be enough.
ok
On the other hand we may want to think about making the Java package
naming better match the component boundaries. Perhaps we should keep
the current package names for the 0.x releases, and reconsider the
structure before doing 1.0 when we have more experience on how the
Tika codebase should best be split to components.
sounds good to me
Thanks
Michael
BR,
Jukka Zitting
