Hi, On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Ken Krugler <kkrugler_li...@transpac.com> wrote: > Easy enough to fix, but in looking through the tika-mimetypes.xml file I > wonder how many other types need similar treatment.
As mentioned in my previous email, the type registry could do with some implicit supertype settings like the following (in order): * a type with an explicit <sub-class-of/> setting is a specialization of the specified type * a type with parameters is a specialization of the same type without parameters * all */*+xml types are specializations of application/xml * all text/* types are specializations of text/plain * everything is a specialization of application/octet-stream BR, Jukka Zitting
