I created TIKA-308 to capture this issue.
Leaving on vacation soon, but should be able to submit a patch in
early November.
-- Ken
On Sep 30, 2009, at 2:38am, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Ken Krugler
<kkrugler_li...@transpac.com> wrote:
Easy enough to fix, but in looking through the tika-mimetypes.xml
file I
wonder how many other types need similar treatment.
As mentioned in my previous email, the type registry could do with
some implicit supertype settings like the following (in order):
* a type with an explicit <sub-class-of/> setting is a specialization
of the specified type
* a type with parameters is a specialization of the same type
without parameters
* all */*+xml types are specializations of application/xml
* all text/* types are specializations of text/plain
* everything is a specialization of application/octet-stream
BR,
Jukka Zitting
--------------------------
Ken Krugler
TransPac Software, Inc.
<http://www.transpac.com>
+1 530-210-6378
