Christopher Schmidt wrote: > Oh, actually, there's a second explanation which I hadn't thought of > which seems more likely: there's far more tilesets coming in which are > *not* coming in through the request management mechanism. I don't know > much about the current state of things: can someone who does know what > is going on in the 'lowzoom' world comment on whether some significant > change in processing might have happened about 3 weeks ago? Given the > 'gaps' I'm seeing here, some external process filling up the tileset > queue does seem a likely (or at least possible) explanation that I > hadn't thought of until just now.
I don't know who's downloading or how lowzoom is working now. But it's perfectly possible (and for lowzoom probable) that these are never recorded in the tile queue system. IMHO tile requests can come in at zoom level 12 and 6 (if I remember right), but many low zoom renderers just shove up whatever they want AFAIK... I don't know how easy it would be to count those unsolicited tiles too. Sebastian _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tilesathome
