> Instead of proclaiming a bottleneck, why not show us? You can test on [EMAIL PROTECTED] server how much faster is copying one big file than hounders of small files.
My tests shows that copying 100 tilesets (700kB, 138 actuall tiles) over nfs on LAN needs 8 seconds for 1 file per tileset and 65 seconds for one file per tile. > Things I can see in favor of these aggregated files would be that you would > probably need to look at most at 4 of these on any higher zoomlevel (~z14 > and up) to get a whole area out of them. Don't forget about blank tiles. Serving tiles with zoom bigger than z12 requires no mysql access, blankness info is saved in tileset file. _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tilesathome
