On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 02:09:48PM +0200, Michael Bergbauer wrote: > On Mon Jun 09, 2008 at 01:4531PM +0200, spaetz wrote: > > Everything can help, but moving away from a NFS attached disk should be the > > lowest hanging fruit that would make many of the proposed solutions > > redundant, I'd gues. > > Yes, true. However: the change I suggested can be made now. For local > disks we have to wait a while.
They have been ordered since quite a while, so I would not expect that it takes too long. If you think that you can improve the [EMAIL PROTECTED] server without introducing overhead once we switch back to local disks, why don't you go ahead and patch the server? crschmidt is the guy to ask for a login account on the tah machine. Others might also apply patch files, if you ask them. spaetz _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tilesathome
