On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:38 PM, spaetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:14:16PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote: > > spaetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 05:18:46PM +0200, Rodolphe Quiedeville wrote: > > > > > >> > Sounds very cool. What do you think should we do with it? Install > > >> > a really powerful [EMAIL PROTECTED] client? The server seems to become > > >> > more > > >> > stable now (/me crosses thumbs) and has jsut got 32GB and big > > >> > local disks. > > >> > > > >> > Is bandwidth an issue? The [EMAIL PROTECTED] server has something like > > >> > 4TB/month > > >> > (very roughly). > > >> What is big in your mind ? ;-) > > > > > > Ohh, there's tons of unrelated stuff on that NFS disk, so a df > > > wouldn't help much. I have no real clue how much space we take on the > > > disk. > > > > > > As, I said, bandwidth is probably more of a problem. > > > > Maybe we should move OSMXAPI there. And while it is idling it can > > render tiles. > > That sounds like an excellent plan >
Demand for OSMXAPI continues to increase. It's currently being throttled to limit requests to about 0.2% of the planet at a time. More capacity would be great. I'm currently building another instance on fafnir (an OSM server), but its not especially big so it won't hold out forever. 80n > > spaetz > > _______________________________________________ > Tilesathome mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome >
_______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
