Sebastian I'm putting OSMXAPI on it at the moment. BTW its now optimised for bboxes so it can handle [EMAIL PROTECTED] render requests with ease.
80n ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: spaetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:38 PM Subject: Re: [Tilesathome] Xen virtual machine available To: [email protected] On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:14:16PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote: > spaetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 05:18:46PM +0200, Rodolphe Quiedeville wrote: > > > >> > Sounds very cool. What do you think should we do with it? Install > >> > a really powerful [EMAIL PROTECTED] client? The server seems to become > >> > more > >> > stable now (/me crosses thumbs) and has jsut got 32GB and big > >> > local disks. > >> > > >> > Is bandwidth an issue? The [EMAIL PROTECTED] server has something like > >> > 4TB/month > >> > (very roughly). > >> What is big in your mind ? ;-) > > > > Ohh, there's tons of unrelated stuff on that NFS disk, so a df > > wouldn't help much. I have no real clue how much space we take on the > > disk. > > > > As, I said, bandwidth is probably more of a problem. > > Maybe we should move OSMXAPI there. And while it is idling it can > render tiles. That sounds like an excellent plan spaetz _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
_______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
