Florian Lohoff schrieb: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:56:19AM +0200, Michael Bergbauer wrote: >> Hi everyone >> >> as there are lots of changes to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] clients recently and >> also some >> changes that don't work quite well in the first place, would it probably >> be possible/useful, to have the autoupdate feature of [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> checking out a >> designed 'stable' version from SVN insteast of the latest, with >> potentially lots of bugs in it? >> >> And in order to avoid not testing new code, perhaps have it a >> configuration option to check out stable or latest. > > I second that - I'd like to see a "stable" or "production" branch on > svn which is automatically followed by clients in default - Why not have > the branch to follow in the config. People can try and break things on > HEAD and once the dust has settled merge the changed to production for > clients to check. > > I am running 12 CPUs in 3 machines - All of them multicore so the > breakage yesterday basically brought down all of my instances. While i > like to help fix bugs the main goal must be to keep the map up to date. > > And to be honest - Its a shame to see a 8 CPU machine idle with a load > of 0.2 because the client fails on every tile request. > > Flo >
Even for us "small" users this is very frustating. So the newly discussion about setting up a maintenance(release)/branch is necessary. A few days ago I suggested exactly the same, but got only negative response. Regards Carsten _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
