Carsten Möller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Knut Arne Bjørndal schrieb: >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:52:36AM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote: >>> Carsten Möller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>> If it's stable, just svn-copy it to e.g. \tags\release01 >>>> It's just a pointer, not a physical copy, so don't worry. >>>> Maybe this should be anchored in the config file so >>>> one can decide whether he or she wants to render >>>> safely or test an experimantal version. >>> Currently the client only does 'svn up' for its automatic updates. >>> This wouldn't be so simple with each new release being copied into a >>> new directory. It would then need to be told by the server how the >>> new release is called and do 'svn switch <new_release>'. >>> >>> Another approach could be to have the server tell clients to which rev >>> to update to and clients then do 'svn up -r<new_rev>'. This has the >>> disadvantage that it makes it impossible to apply a bug-fix to the >>> stable version. >> >> It would be much simpler and cleaner to have a single stable directory >> that most clients check out, and the clients can then just run svn >> up. If you want to test a branch or anything you just "svn switch" to >> it. >> >> Yes, this requires merging, but at least with svk it really easy to do >> this. >> >> > Why? You can have two tilesAtHome under different parent directories. > Even a structure that I suggested before should work without merging or > switching versions! One for experimental the other for stable.
When each stable release ends up as a new directory in /tags all clients need to switch to that to update. Matthias _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
