Jiri Klement schrieb: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Christian Ehrlicher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jiri Klement schrieb: >>> Running pnqnq on the whole tileset doesn't make much sense. What pngnq >>> do is find most commonly used colors and build palette of them. If you >>> run pngnq on the whole tileset, then there will be more colors and >>> selected colors will be less optimal. It would be much faster then to >>> simply make some good palette and apply it every tile, no matter what >>> colors the tile use. >>> >> Afaik there's a ongoing work to create a common palette. But for now we >> don't have it. >> I don't see your point - imho it's better to have more tiles with the >> same color palette than every tile with it's on one. > > The problem is that every tile has lots for colors (mainly due to > antialiasing). If every tile has it's own optimalized palette, then > there is bigger change that colors in the pallete will be closer to > real colors. What pngnq takes so long is looking for the optimal > pallete. If you have one pallete for all tiles, then you wouldn't need > pngnq and you will save lots of cpu cycles. > So why was this calculated value exactly the same for a complete tileset? And it wasn't a simple one. Will try with another one tomorrow.
Christian _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
