On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 03:12:21PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote: > Subject: Re: [Tilesathome] Tileset files > > spaetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 2) 1 line per item RFC822 sounds ok... > > OK, that's what it will be. > > > > > Again, let's be very careful about what we want here. Everything > > multiplies with 16mio bytes times the number of layers we have. > > Hey, you just said you are in the process of getting a new server with > plenty of disc space ;-) > > We don't need to go overboard with that. There can be a lot of > information stored in 1 KB. I would start with the OSM data > timestamp, username and client-id. We could also store X, Y, Z and > layer so we don't need to rely on the filename to convey that > information.
The first question needs to be "What are you trying to solve?". Yes it
might be nice to have that information but in the end it should be there
for a reason.
I can see the purpose of finding broken clients/apis but i guess this
information is obsolete after 14 days (3 hours at the commit rate in the
client svn).
So you'd want client version, and data source (API, ROMA, XAPI) and
better put the url in there or some generator name from the osm file as
i'd guess we'll see ROMAs grow like mushrooms.
For finding clients a metadata xml file uploaded parallel to the tileset
and deleted after some time would be sufficient. No need to keep that
data forever ...
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-171-2280134
Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little
security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
