"Jiri Klement" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Memory shouldn't be a problem for Batik. I have memory limit for java > set to 1500MB and I have never encountered a tile I couldn't render. > > But somebody did a benchmark which showed that batik is much slower > than inkscape when tile is rendered in one go. It looked like it's > even slower than when the tile is rendered in stripes by batik. > > Actually I did some profiling of batik and the results where quite > suprising. About 80% of time is spent in method, which copy rendered > element into resulting image. So it's possible that rendering big tile > will be actually slower than rendering many small tiles.
That doesn't sound too good. But, as long as Batik is not bailing out with those big tiles I am happy for now. We can re-implement striped rendering later if necessary. Matthias _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
