Dirk Stöcker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Knut Arne Bjørndal wrote: > >> Just a little note, I see you committed directly to stable, and not to >> unstable. First of all it's nice to put new stuff into unstable, > > Then it should be renamed to "development" and "enduser" or something > like that. When checking in stuff I go by the wording. The lowzoom > stuff is not unstable, but only new. Same is true for bug-fixes. > > For me the unstable tree looked like a testing bed for yet unfinished > ideas and that did not apply.
The name "unstable" might have come from the Debian terminology where "unstable" means that this branch is subject to a lot of changes (because it is the development branch) and not that it blows up all the time. But, a lot of changes mean the introduction of shiny new bugs. If it was a test bed for unfinished ideas it would probably be called "experimental". Of course, everyone goes goes by the wording. The problem is that the same wording has different implications to different people. Matthias _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
