On Samstag, 24. Januar 2009, Ed Loach wrote: > I'm not sure whether it is related, but one of the changes made to JOSM in > the last 24 hours (rev 1327) had this note next to it: "remove > construction=yes, this is not supported by existing renderers and therefore > will lead to confusion" I'm assuming this means from the presets, as I > think you can still add your own keys manually. > > In the case of ti...@home though, if it is causing a problem then it looks > like it is trying to support it in some way.
True. I searched for the rule wich supports this and found it. But the used class 'wrong-under-construction' was not defined. So I'm attaching a suggestion for a patch to this mail. It works but I do not know if the used styles are ok. Regards Andre
Index: stylesheets/osm-map-features-z17.xml
===================================================================
--- stylesheets/osm-map-features-z17.xml (Revision 13337)
+++ stylesheets/osm-map-features-z17.xml (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -3884,6 +3884,7 @@
/* Generic under-construction style - makes any way dashed */
+ .wrong-under-construction { stroke-width: 0.5px; stroke: #ffffff; stroke-dasharray: 0.5, 0.5; fill:none; }
.under-construction-1 { stroke-width: 0.1px; stroke: #707070; stroke-dasharray: 0.5, 0.5; stroke-linecap: butt; fill:none; }
.under-construction-2 { stroke-dasharray: 4, 4; stroke-linecap: butt;}
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
