D Tucny schrieb: > <http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=51.912&lon=7.737&zoom=16>
> > But the stream is tagged as layer -1, so is underground as landuse > > will assume 0 (but render behind other layer 0 objects). > > Yes, streams are often tagged as -1 so that they are rendered > under streets. In Wiki there is also the recommendation to > tag waterways as -1. > > So landuse should never cover other objects. > Landuse should be assumed as layer -100. ;-) > > > I thought there was a discussion about this at some point in the past > and that the outcome was that the feeling was that landuse should be > drawn first, though allowing layers within the landuse 'layer' then > other features drawn over whatever the outcome of the landuse layer > was... which, would be effectively the same as making landuse > effectively exist at -100 to -90... > Can't remember the details, but will try and find the mails... It makes no sense that a "virtual" object like landuse covers any "real" object like streams or whatever, no matter what the layer is. And as you can check, Mapnik renders the above example correct. Chris _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
