2009/2/4 Chris-Hein Lunkhusen <[email protected]> > Ed Loach schrieb: > > >> Here is an example: > >> > >> <http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=51.912&lon=7.737&zoom=1 > >> 6> > > > > But the stream is tagged as layer -1, so is underground as landuse > > will assume 0 (but render behind other layer 0 objects). > > Yes, streams are often tagged as -1 so that they are rendered > under streets. In Wiki there is also the recommendation to > tag waterways as -1. > > So landuse should never cover other objects. > Landuse should be assumed as layer -100. ;-) >
I thought there was a discussion about this at some point in the past and that the outcome was that the feeling was that landuse should be drawn first, though allowing layers within the landuse 'layer' then other features drawn over whatever the outcome of the landuse layer was... which, would be effectively the same as making landuse effectively exist at -100 to -90...Can't remember the details, but will try and find the mails... d
_______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
