On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:23, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/2/15 Knut Arne Bjørndal <[email protected]>: >> >> >> I also seem to recall that if I drew the buildings above the road core >> roads could easily get swallowed completely in some cases, which is a >> bad idea. >> > > of course the road would get swallowed when the buildings are mapped > on them, but this is bad mapping, and not bad rendering.
Is accurately mapping a building that was built above or below a road "bad mapping?" Or accurately mapping the pedestrian streets in Edinburgh, Scotland (and some other old European cities, I assume) that are only just wide enough for two broad-shouldered adults to pass? It sounds like you're implying that anywhere that the rendering of a building happens to cover the rendering of a road is the mapper's fault, when there are plenty of places that pure geographic accuracy would result in an unusable map. -- David J. Lynch [email protected] _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
