Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> writes: > Please be aware that you're not operating at the root of the SVN tree. > If you introduce a tags directory then - unless I'm completely mistaken > - anyone who does a checkout of the whole OSM SVN tree will have every > single tagged version downloaded (SVN is not clever enough to download > identical files only once) and placed in his file system.
Certainly, we don't want people to check out the whole -dev root tree. > > The tag/branch/trunk technique can be used if people can be expected to > check out only trunk, or selected versions from tag/branch, but IMHO it > is unsuitable for subtrees. > > If you want tag/branch/trunk then get svn.tah.openstreetmap.org and make > the distinction at root level - don't make the distinction four levels > down in the global SVN. Well, we have that already. Setting up tags/branches/trunk inside the project sub-directory is also recommended practice. And I don't think it is a bad one. That our project root is at the third level down does not hurt there in my view. I don't think it is necessary to set up a separate repository to follow that scheme. Now, the suggestion was to also integrate the stable client directory into the -dev tree. And it is not entirely clear to me how that is supposed to look like. Another possibility could be to move tilesAtHome into tilesAtHome-dev/stable. But, personally, I would just leave everything as it is. Matthias _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
