Inkscape typically hangs on jobs > 1G but some jobs run easily up to 2-3G it's unpredictable. same tile may render successfully if you run it again. Didn't compare runtime and mem usage between Batik and Inkscape. Even with Batik I have to render in stripes for real complex tiles. Batik crashes from time to time but some of these are crashes of the Java VM. check the TAH page and you will see many failed jobs because many clients fail to render complex tiles or reject them at all one of the most complex tiles I have seen is in germany in Stuttgart. If you can render it your setup is good.
On 1 Oct 2009, at 7:50 , Matti Viljanen wrote: > On 10/01/2009 02:29 PM, Dirk-Lüder Kreie wrote: >> Apollinaris Schoell schrieb: >>> I switched to Batik instead Inkscape. If Batik has problems it >>> will crash >>> and the script continues. Inkscape will just hang forever >> >> Inkscape has reportedly mixed code and resulting bad memory >> management >> and will hang or crash on out-of-memory situations. > > I have 8 gigs of RAM, and sizes of hung Inkscapes have been somewhere > between 1,5 and 2,5 GiB for me. But, when using such large amounts of > memory, to whatever purpose, memory management must be implemented > properly. I, as a programmer, cherish good-quality code over speed.* > > About Inkscape and Batik... Which one renders faster, and which one > uses > less memory doing so? > -- > mV > > _______________________________________________ > Tilesathome mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
